Search
English
Deutsch
Pусский
Nederlands
Français
日本語
Español
中文
한국어
|
Contact Us
|
About Us
Interbrand
Interbrand Companies
InterbrandHealth
Interbrand Design Forum
BrandWizard
Interbrand Inspired Foundation
Our Work
By Client
By Discipline
Analytics
Brand Strategy
Brand Valuation
Corporate Design
Digital
Digital Brand Management
Health
Internal Brand Engagement
Naming
Packaging Design
Retail
Verbal Identity
Knowledge
Branding Studies
Papers & Articles
Blog
Books
brandchannel
IQ
2013
Best Asian Brands
What's in Store for 2013
Political Issue
Digital Issue
Corporate Citizenship Issue
Creative Issue
Best Global Brands
2012 Report
Report
Report (Brand View)
Interactive Charts
Applications & Methodology
The Human Issue
Downloads
Previous Years
2011 Report
2010 Report
2009 Report
2008 Report
2007 Report
2006 Report
2005 Report
2004 Report
2003 Report
2002 Report
2001 Report
Best Global Green Brands
2012 Report
2011 Report
News Room
Press Releases
In the News
Awards & Recognition
Careers
Offices
Best Global Brands 2012
The Top 100 Brands
The Human Story
Sector Overviews
Interviews & Articles
Charts
Applications & Methodology
Contact Info & Downloads
75
+7%
$4,788 $m
Shell
Given the controversy surrounding the safety performance of the category, building a positive public image is difficult for oil brands. Shell, however, rose to the challenge and, despite an oil spill off the coast of Nigeria, managed to maintain a strong brand image. That image, however, is at risk of becoming tarnished as Shell dives into the highly controversial business of Arctic drilling. Shell’s actions in the Arctic have made it the target of culture jamming, a tactic that involves subverting the media as a form of protest. In this case, Greenpeace and activist duo, the Yes Men, created an elaborate hoax in which they impersonated Shell and used a fake website and video to make their statement. Perhaps wisely, Shell has not reacted strongly to the stunt. It is too early to predict how Arctic drilling will affect profits and how pressure from environmental activists will affect Shell’s brand strength. To safeguard its image — and avoid the negative consequences and cost of an accident — Shell might consider cooperating with those who want to develop a vision for the Arctic that is based on science, preparedness, and protecting the health of ecosystems.
Shell
The Time of Tough Choices is Upon Us
IQ: The Corporate Citizenship Issue
Copyright © 2013 Interbrand. All Rights Reserved.